UN Working Group Chair on Vardanyan Has Questionable Links to Azerbaijan

An expert opinion from the first Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, Luis Moreno Ocampo, reveals a conflict of interest that invalidates the outcome
The UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention (UNWGAD) is the body of independent experts appointed by the United Nations Human Rights Council (UNHCR) to investigate cases where people are deprived of their liberty in violation of international human rights standards.
On February 17, 2025, the UN Working Group on Arbitrary Detention integrated by Ganna Yudkivska, issued Opinion No. 46/2024 concluding that Ruben Vardanyan detention by Azerbaijan was not arbitrary.
Such opinion is contradicting the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Mr Volker Türk who on March 3, 2025 presented to the Human Rights Council a different point view. He demanded that “all those arbitrarily detained in Azerbaijan, including ethnic Armenians, must be released immediately, and fair trial rights must be fully respected”.
Opinion No. 46/2024 is also exceptional in the Working Group jurisprudence. All the other 70 decisions adopted by the Working Group about 2024 claims favoured the claimants. In 69 cases the WGAD concluded that the detentions were arbitrary, the other was transmitted to the Committee against Torture, but the Working Group concluded that Ruben Vardanyan’s detention was not arbitrary.
An expert opinion from Luis Moreno Ocampo, the founder Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court, shows that one of the independent experts, current Chair Rapporteur Ms. Ganna Yudkivska, has close com
The report reveals that Ganna Yudkivska is a member of Equity Law Firm, which represents the commercial interests of the State Oil Company of the Azerbaijan Republic (SOCAR) in Ukraine. Moreover, it reveals public records showing that Ms.Ganna Yudkivsk
Ganna Yudkivska was appointed to the UNWGAD in October 2022. According to the UN’s rules, her ties to Azerbaijan should have precluded her from being a member of the Working Group in cases connected with Azerbaijan. Her work as a partner at Equity Law Firm establishes a direct financial link between her and the Azerbaijani Government, itself a party to the proceedings in Opinion No. 46/2024 Ruben Vardanyan (v. Azerbaijan).
Mr. Ocampo’s report reveals multiple contraventions of UN rules, including Articles 3(a), 3(d), 3(e), and 3(i) of the UN Code of Conduct which mandate independence, impartiality, integrity and the prohibition of private gain; as well as Regulation 2(h) of ST/SGB/2002/9 which requires recusal when financial interests overlap with United Nations functions. Ms. Yudkivska’s failure to disclose her role or to abstain from related proceedings further constitutes a breach of Paragraph 5 of the UNWGAD Methods of Work, which stipulates recusal in cases where conflicts of interest exist.
Commenting, former ICC Prospector, Luis Moreno Ocampo, said:
“These are gross contraventions of UN rules. Ganna Yudkivska’sprofes
He mentioned that Hasmik Egian made a similar comment on the decision calling it a “travesty of justice.”
The report finds further conflicts of interest relating to Ms. Ganna Yudkivska’s half-
As an MP, Mr Logvynskyi, whose father was born in Goychay, Azerbaijan, was an active member of the Ukrainian Working Group on Interparliamentary Relations with Azerbaijan. In December 2016, he attended the 25th anniversary of Azerbaijan’s independence celebrations in Kiev; and in February 2017 he travelled to Azerbaijan with the Ukrainian Parliamentary Working Group. In media interviews to mark his appointment as Vice-Chair of the Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe (PACE) in January 2017, Mr Logvynskyi is quoted as saying that “Azerbaijan is always in my heart”; and that “without a doubt, Nagorno-Karabakh is an integral part of Azerbaijan”. Ruben Vardanyan was detained for his role protecting Nagorno-Karabakh.
On 20 March 2024 when the American lawyer representing Ruben Vardanyan, Jared Genser, first filed the case before the UNWGAD, no information existed on UN info
Lawyers working for Ruben Vardanyan now have the option ofrequesting a revision of the previous decision, or asking for anew petition demanding that Ms. Ganna Yudkivska recus
Other lawyers are also preparing additional
Without any further request, the WGAD could provide more information on how this case was managed, who served as the case rapporteur and how they were selected.
Notes: