Washington, DC – The United States Commission on International Religious Freedom (USCIRF) reiterates its recommendation for the U.S. Department of State to place Turkey on its Special Watch List for severe violations of religious freedom. This recommendation echoes actions taken by the European Court of Human Rights and European Parliament this month in response to Turkey targeting foreign Christians. “Turkey’s arbitrary labeling of foreign-born Protestant Christians as national security threats is meant to intimidate the Christian community and prevent them from gathering for worship. Everyone, regardless of residency status, has the right to freedom of religion or belief under international law,” said Chair Vicky Hartzler. “The U.S. administration should maintain the momentum President Trump made in his September meeting with President Erdoğan and push for tangible improvements to Turkey’s religious freedom record, including an end to its repressive tactics against Christians.” Turkey maintains several laws and policies restricting religious freedom for religious minorities, including both religious minority groups and secularists. For example, authorities prevent Christian communities from training their clergy domestically, obstruct the registration of Alevi, Protestant, and Jehovah’s Witness houses of worship, and refuse to grant legal personality and full autonomy to religious communities. The government also imposes its preferred interpretation of Islam on the population, regardless of religion or belief, prosecuting those it deems to have expressed offensive religious views. Additionally, authorities hinder the exemption of students, including dissenting Muslims, from state-mandated courses on Sunni Islam. “We welcome steps European bodies have taken to hold Turkey accountable for its systematic violations of religious freedom,” said USCIRF Vice Chair Asif Mahmood. “We urge the U.S. government to prioritize freedom of religion or belief as part of its bilateral relations with Turkey and raise with Turkish government officials the obstacles to religious minorities’ access to houses of worship and clergy, such as barriers to continued legal residency and restrictions on clerical institutions including the Theological School of Halki.” In its 2025 Annual Report, USCIRF recommended that the State Department place Turkey on the Special Watch List for severe violations of religious freedom. In August 2025, USCIRF held a hearing on freedom of religion or belief in Turkey. Here is the report’s section on Turkey: TURKEY USCIRF–RECOMMENDED FOR SPECIAL WATCH LIST KEY FINDINGS In 2025, the government of Turkey (Türkiye) engaged in systematic and ongoing severe violations of religious freedom, consistent with the previous year. At the same time, the administration of President Recep Tayyip Erdog˘an continued its dialogue with certain historical religious communities, including negotiations with the Eastern Orthodox Christian Church to potentially reopen the Halki Theological School, which closed in 1971 in response to government policies. The government also continued restoring some historical houses of worship, with the Ministry of Culture and Tourism beginning renovations on Cappadocia’s medieval St. George Church as part of a tourism promotion campaign. However, many religious communities did not substantially benefit from such measures, with several—including Alevis, Protestant Christians, and Jehovah’s Witnesses—unable to secure legal recognition as religions or approval to register, build, or restore houses of worship for day-to-day use. Amid a large-scale government crackdown on political expres- sion in support of opposition leaders, authorities also systematically violated religious freedom by punishing secularist sentiment in state institutions and continuing to enforce Article 216 of the Turkish Penal Code as a de facto law against blasphemy. In January, the Ministry of Defense officially dismissed five new lieutenants and their three superior officers for choosing a secularist oath for their swearing-in ceremony. The government also monitored online activity for perceived insults to Islam and prosecuted religious dissenters under Article 216(3) for “incitement of hatred toward another group based on religious differences.” For example, in June, the Ministry of the Interior arrested and detained at least four employees of the satirical magazine LeMan for publishing a cartoon that rioters decried as an alleged caricature of the Prophet Muhammad. Ministry of Justice officials also announced their inves- tigation of the journalists for “publicly insulting religious values.” In ˙September, the Istanbul Chief Public Prosecutor’s Office charged YouTube interviewer Bog˘aç Soydemir and his guest Enes Akgündüz with “inciting hatred and enmity or insulting a segment of the public” for reading aloud a viewer-submitted joke relating to the Prophet Muhammad. In contrast to these and other state restric- tions on religious expression, in March, Turkey’s top appeals court overturned the conviction of a man who had publicly vowed to kill Jews, Americans, and Kurds. The national legislature also imposed additional, systematic restrictions on freedom of religion or belief (FoRB). In June, the par- liament enacted a legislative amendment expanding the authority of the state-controlled Directorate of Religious Affairs (Diyanet) to ban the distribution of Qur’an translations it considers inconsistent with Islamic principles. Prison authorities, too, restricted access to Qur’ans, other religious literature, and daily Islamic ablutions for some defendants, such as former detainee Aysu Öztas¸ Bayram. Alevi advocates continued raising their own concerns over the scope of the Diyanet, pointing to its almost exclusive emphasis on Sunni Muslim institutions and communities—affording them official recognition as a religion and providing them with public funding and support for which Alevis, as part of a designated “cultural” tradition, remained ineligible. The government reportedly intensified a multiple-year cam- paign invoking spurious national security concerns to cut off the legal residency status of at least 375 foreign national Christian clergy, their family members, and other religious workers, to date. Throughout 2025, authorities continued to use immigration codes N-82 and G-87 to designate these clergy and laity as “national security threats,” barring them from renewing their residency status or reentering Turkey after travel abroad. These religious leaders had long resided lawfully in the country, serving Turkish Protestant Christian communities in part due to ongoing govern- ment restrictions on domestic Christian clergy training programs and educational institutions. Protestant Christians and Jehovah’s Witnesses reported additional obstacles to their legal recognition and access to houses of worship, with officials thwarting both their applications for new construction and their attempts to repurpose disused historical churches for their regular worship needs. RECOMMENDATIONS TO THE U.S. GOVERNMENT ■ Include Turkey on the Special Watch List, or SWL, for engaging in or tolerating severe violations of religious freedom pursuant to the International Religious Freedom Act (IRFA); ■ Link future U.S. security assistance and bilateral trade policies to improvements of religious freedom in Turkey; and ■ Capitalize on the U.S-Turkey bilateral rela- tionship to stress the importance to FoRB in Turkey of ceasing national security bans on foreign national clergy and easing restrictions on clergy training programs and institutions, registration of religious groups, and access to houses of worship. The U.S. Congress should: ■ Hold hearings on religious freedom in Tur- key and send congressional delegations to the country to raise specific issues, including the repression of FoRB in public education, the denial of U.S. clergy from re-entering the country on false security threats, and conditions for refugees in Turkey who have a credible fear of expulsion back to religious persecution in their home countries; and ■ Invoke its legislative authority to conduct an investigation into Turkey’s enforcement of Article 216 of the Penal Code as a de facto blasphemy law to inform future leg- islation addressing this issue. KEY USCIRF RESOURCES & ACTIVITIES ■ Hearing: Freedom of Religion or Belief in Turkey ■ Frank R. Wolf Freedom of Religion or Belief Victims List and Appendix 2 Background Turkey’s distinct legacy of political secularism is a founding principle of the 102-year-old republic, reflected in the constitution’s emphasis on the secular nature of the state and its acknowledgment of free- dom of religion and conscience. However, both demographic and political trends have contributed to a recent increase in state-spon- sored and social marginalization of non-Sunni Muslims. Turkey classifies 99.8 percent of its almost 85 million population as Muslim, including an estimated 10–25 million Alevis—many of whom do not consider themselves Muslim. Ja’fari Shi’a Muslims constitute a tiny minority of the population, and the government regards less than one percent of the population as non-Muslim, including Greek and Syriac Orthodox Christians, Roman and Chaldean Catholic Chris- tians, Armenian Apostolic and Protestant Christians, Baha’is, Jews, Yazidis, and others. The government maintains formal relationships with some of these religious minorities, partly in interpretation of the 1923 Treaty of Lausanne, which acknowledged “[non-Muslim] minorities” with longstanding ties to the former Ottoman Empire. In 2025, such rela- tions included President Erdog˘an’s condolences in January to Turkish Jewish communities upon the death of the country’s Chief Rabbi Rav Isek Haleva. In November, President Erdog˘ an welcomed Pope Leo XIV, who visited Turkey for the global celebration of the 1,700th anni- versary of the Council of Nicaea. The pontiff met with the Ecumenical Patriarch of Constantinople Bartholomew I of the Eastern Orthodox Church, as well as other Turkish Christian communities. Other Government Policies Restricting FoRB Eastern Orthodox Church members continued to await the results of protracted negotiations between church leaders and the government of Turkey to set a public date for the reopening of the Halki School, 54 years after government policies induced its closure. In the meantime, Eastern Orthodox Christians, like their Protestant and other Christian counterparts, remained ineligible for domestic training, resorting to seminary programs abroad. TURKEY In other forms of education, a lack of religious choice and diver- sity remained a major concern for Christian, Alevi, Shi’a Muslim, and secularist parents. Even as new research revealed a significant decline in the number of Turks who describe themselves as devout and an increase in those who identify as atheists or nonbelievers, public schools continued to require the majority of pupils to take courses in religion, pursuant to the constitution. In light of other state policies blocking Alevis, atheists, Protestant Christians, and others—especially converts from Islam—from obtaining accurate and official documen- tation of their religious identity, many pupils from these backgrounds faced misidentification as Sunni Muslims and, consequently, compul- sory coursework on the tenets of Islam. Key U.S. Policy In 2025, the administration of President Donald J. Trump maintained the United States’ strategic bilateral relationship with Turkey. How- ever, the administration’s pause on foreign assistance in 2025 had an immediate impact on nongovernmental organizations (NGOs) in Tur- key, such as the International Catholic Migration Commission (ICMC) that had supported people seeking protection from severe religious persecution in their home countries. In March, the House Foreign Affairs Europe Subcommittee held a hearing on Turkey. In June, the Tom Lantos Human Rights Committee held a hearing on human rights in Turkey, citing USCIRF’s 2025 Annual Report recommendation that the United States add Turkey to the Special Watch List. In September, the administration took several measures to high- light religious freedom in Turkey. Michael J. Rigas, deputy secretary of state for Management and Resources, hosted an event in honor of Ecumenical Patriarch Bartholomew I. The next day, the ecumenical patriarch and President Trump met and reportedly discussed chal- lenging religious freedom conditions for Christians in Turkey. Later that month, President Trump received President Erdog˘an, affirmatively raising the question of the Halki School’s potential reopening Displaying 7E9AF6E8-64E1-437E-921A-E87BBEA81934.jpeg.
When you join a multiplayer lobby and see a teammate’s weapon with a shiny and wild animated mastery camo, do you get speechless? I certainly do. The animated camos are a form of flex. It communicates to the rest of the lobby the sheer number of hours spent grinding and the frustration endured for the reward. It is a badge of honor and triggers your desire to sink your time and patience into getting the same camo.
The mastery camo is as tough as nails. Esports is a culture of its own. For them, it’s not about the victor; it’s all about the rewards. The first time I really tried for Damascus camo was in the newest Modern Warfare in 2019, and I can still remember the sleepless weekends. I almost uninstalled the game for the riot shield kills. Playing Shipment and camping is deterministic torture.
The passion offers the evils of the camo grind. The entire player base just wants to flex without the time spent grinding. This is the main reason people look for Call of Duty accounts for sale, so people can slide right into Warzone or ranked as a vet, bypassing the 3 weeks of grind to unlock the support kills to make the attachment for the scope the most level 1 whatever of an attachment. Now, let’s talk about the reasons for the status of the players and the reasons for the value from the grind.
Why We Put Ourselves Through It
What brings people to the most hardcore levels of the game in the first place? Players’ self-achievements, gamer recognition, and community recognition. The community standing out system makes use of the human desire for uniqueness.
When players unlock the last tier, the brain does backflips of joy and dopamine. Other players celebrate the gamer’s achievement. A player with a default M4 is plain. A player with a cool Interstellar camo is unique and maybe even a target.
The following are the reasons players are addicted to the grind:
- The Checkbox Effect. Players get easily accomplished by quotes, setting smaller goals like “Get 50 hip-fire kills.”
- Sunk Cost Fallacy. After putting in twenty hours of grinding to unlock golden skins for the assault rifles, not finishing the grind seems pointless. You lose yourself to the grind.
- Lobby Status. Having a cool gun skin or a special player title to show off is a societal status indicator for players.
- Completionist Habits. Failure is not an option for gamers. Seeing a progress bar that is close to 100% but not there means they will keep grinding to finish the progress bar.
When You Have More Money Than Time
Not having time available to complete a grind is a pretty common reality in the player base. Players include college kids relaxing for the summer to parents with full-time jobs, houses, and families to take care of.
- For an adult, it is almost impossible to find the 150 hours necessary to complete a camo grind. They will be lucky if they get to play 3 hours a week. By the time they’ve finished their challenges, the new Call of Duty is about to be released. Dedicated Call of Duty franchise fans frequenting search online to find Call of Duty accounts to purchase have been motivated by this very time gap.
- For the busy gamer, it is simply a transactional exchange of time to purchase convenience. With less time to spare, but having money to utilize, which allows them to skip time-consuming activities for fun activities, is how they justify the expense. Purchases not only allow them to unlock the cool stuff, but enhanced the enjoyment of gaming together with friends.
Some would say, rightly so, that some weapon challenges can be a bit frustrating. An emotionally taxing grind is having to go for point-blank sniper kills while the opposing players go meta with the other classes.
What Do Buyers Actually Want?
No sensible gamer would purchase accounts that are not high-level. Buyers’ accounts, which are considered high value, are accounts that are not easily attainable, that is to say, have features that are recent, relevant, and notable.
A few examples of gamer fans’ stats are as follows:
- Ultimate Mastery Camos: Dark Matter, Orion, and Interstellar are all examples of master fully unlocked camos on each gun that are considered to be top tier.
- Ranked Badges: Top 250 or Iridescent calling cards if you really want to show off.
- Nuke Rewards: Exclusive operator skins that you get for completing ridiculously tough tactical nuke contracts in Warzone.
- Scary KD Ratios: Having unique stats to make people fearful of you in the lobby.
Comparing the True Cost
Let’s put the journey into perspective and look at a simple comparison chart of the two options:
|
Aspect |
Doing the Grind |
Buying an Account |
|
Time Needed |
Takes 100+ hours of gameplay |
Takes about 10 minutes of browsing |
|
Money Cost |
Free (aside from the base game) |
Can be expensive depending on rarity and demand |
|
Stress Level |
Often slow, repetitive, and sometimes frustrating |
Low stress due to instant access |
|
Safety |
Fully safe (progress is legitimately yours) |
Risky due to scams, account recovery issues, and potential bans depending on game rules |
The Risks You Take
Skipping to the end of the line communicates value, but there are several risks. The account swapping game has no rules. For an honest account sale, a scam is lurking. This is the main reason why you should be extra careful if you want to buy a Call of Duty account. I have a friend who bought an account from a random user on a forum instead of a verified site.
He gave them cash, played for a week, and then found himself locked out. The account was reclaimed by the original owner through official support. My friend lost his money and the account. If you take this route, you need to use reliable marketplaces that provide genuine buyer protection.
Why Some Players Enjoy the Struggle
Among the crowd, there exists a mystery, a bizarre enchantment, and a gripping journey, which soaks up time and effort.
However, a loaded account does not grant you memories. It is not the account where you have the newly released cross-map throwing knife for gold. It is not the troll account of bad weapons. It is not the tedious account of shooting to improve your core to push your movement and map awareness.
Lastly, long-term goals help orientation. Being forced to push the camo makes you motivate yourself to improve your game to remain engaged. It is much faster to become bored with a game like Call of Duty when there is so little to work towards, and things are just given.
The Wrap Up
Just playing Call of Duty is just to have fun, and with camo, we can do just that. We get the pleasure of entertaining ourselves without much effort, doing the grind.
Some players enjoy the thrill of spending countless hours early morning just to play the game and unlock every camo, and others dislike wasting time to unlock camos and would prefer a good game. Both are reasonable. As long as everyone in the community respects having these custom and preferred game loadouts, these stats and flashy promise of mastery camos will remain.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is buying an account a quick way to get banned?
Accounts will remain safe as long as they are bought from safe places. Make sure to buy from a reliable account and game loadout losing company.
Just how long does a mastery camo take to unlock?
Time to unlock mastery camo depends on the game, and mostly, it takes a good and fast player 100 – 150 hours.
3. Do pro players have mastery camos?
Not exactly. Mastery camos are more of a testament to your level of patience. That being said, having to use certain loadouts won’t help your situational awareness.
4. Why do designers create annoying tasks?
Challenging tasks help players develop new skills. It’s also a good tactic to keep players engaged, as these challenges require a significant investment of time to complete.
5. Is buying accounts a hardware ban offense?
This is more common with blatant cheating, like using aimbots and wallhacks. It is very unlikely that just playing on a new, purchased account would result in a hardware ban, though the account could get banned if it were unfairly leveled.
When you join a multiplayer lobby and see a teammate’s weapon with a shiny and wild animated mastery camo, do you get speechless? I certainly do. The animated camos are a form of flex. It communicates to the rest of the lobby the sheer number of hours spent grinding and the frustration endured for the reward. It is a badge of honor and triggers your desire to sink your time and patience into getting the same camo.
The mastery camo is as tough as nails. Esports is a culture of its own. For them, it’s not about the victor; it’s all about the rewards. The first time I really tried for Damascus camo was in the newest Modern Warfare in 2019, and I can still remember the sleepless weekends. I almost uninstalled the game for the riot shield kills. Playing Shipment and camping is deterministic torture.
The passion offers the evils of the camo grind. The entire player base just wants to flex without the time spent grinding. This is the main reason people look for Call of Duty accounts for sale, so people can slide right into Warzone or ranked as a vet, bypassing the 3 weeks of grind to unlock the support kills to make the attachment for the scope the most level 1 whatever of an attachment. Now, let’s talk about the reasons for the status of the players and the reasons for the value from the grind.
Why We Put Ourselves Through It
What brings people to the most hardcore levels of the game in the first place? Players’ self-achievements, gamer recognition, and community recognition. The community standing out system makes use of the human desire for uniqueness.
When players unlock the last tier, the brain does backflips of joy and dopamine. Other players celebrate the gamer’s achievement. A player with a default M4 is plain. A player with a cool Interstellar camo is unique and maybe even a target.
The following are the reasons players are addicted to the grind:
- The Checkbox Effect. Players get easily accomplished by quotes, setting smaller goals like “Get 50 hip-fire kills.”
- Sunk Cost Fallacy. After putting in twenty hours of grinding to unlock golden skins for the assault rifles, not finishing the grind seems pointless. You lose yourself to the grind.
- Lobby Status. Having a cool gun skin or a special player title to show off is a societal status indicator for players.
- Completionist Habits. Failure is not an option for gamers. Seeing a progress bar that is close to 100% but not there means they will keep grinding to finish the progress bar.
When You Have More Money Than Time
Not having time available to complete a grind is a pretty common reality in the player base. Players include college kids relaxing for the summer to parents with full-time jobs, houses, and families to take care of.
- For an adult, it is almost impossible to find the 150 hours necessary to complete a camo grind. They will be lucky if they get to play 3 hours a week. By the time they’ve finished their challenges, the new Call of Duty is about to be released. Dedicated Call of Duty franchise fans frequenting search online to find Call of Duty accounts to purchase have been motivated by this very time gap.
- For the busy gamer, it is simply a transactional exchange of time to purchase convenience. With less time to spare, but having money to utilize, which allows them to skip time-consuming activities for fun activities, is how they justify the expense. Purchases not only allow them to unlock the cool stuff, but enhanced the enjoyment of gaming together with friends.
Some would say, rightly so, that some weapon challenges can be a bit frustrating. An emotionally taxing grind is having to go for point-blank sniper kills while the opposing players go meta with the other classes.
What Do Buyers Actually Want?
No sensible gamer would purchase accounts that are not high-level. Buyers’ accounts, which are considered high value, are accounts that are not easily attainable, that is to say, have features that are recent, relevant, and notable.
A few examples of gamer fans’ stats are as follows:
- Ultimate Mastery Camos: Dark Matter, Orion, and Interstellar are all examples of master fully unlocked camos on each gun that are considered to be top tier.
- Ranked Badges: Top 250 or Iridescent calling cards if you really want to show off.
- Nuke Rewards: Exclusive operator skins that you get for completing ridiculously tough tactical nuke contracts in Warzone.
- Scary KD Ratios: Having unique stats to make people fearful of you in the lobby.
Comparing the True Cost
Let’s put the journey into perspective and look at a simple comparison chart of the two options:
|
Aspect |
Doing the Grind |
Buying an Account |
|
Time Needed |
Takes 100+ hours of gameplay |
Takes about 10 minutes of browsing |
|
Money Cost |
Free (aside from the base game) |
Can be expensive depending on rarity and demand |
|
Stress Level |
Often slow, repetitive, and sometimes frustrating |
Low stress due to instant access |
|
Safety |
Fully safe (progress is legitimately yours) |
Risky due to scams, account recovery issues, and potential bans depending on game rules |
The Risks You Take
Skipping to the end of the line communicates value, but there are several risks. The account swapping game has no rules. For an honest account sale, a scam is lurking. This is the main reason why you should be extra careful if you want to buy a Call of Duty account. I have a friend who bought an account from a random user on a forum instead of a verified site.
He gave them cash, played for a week, and then found himself locked out. The account was reclaimed by the original owner through official support. My friend lost his money and the account. If you take this route, you need to use reliable marketplaces that provide genuine buyer protection.
Why Some Players Enjoy the Struggle
Among the crowd, there exists a mystery, a bizarre enchantment, and a gripping journey, which soaks up time and effort.
However, a loaded account does not grant you memories. It is not the account where you have the newly released cross-map throwing knife for gold. It is not the troll account of bad weapons. It is not the tedious account of shooting to improve your core to push your movement and map awareness.
Lastly, long-term goals help orientation. Being forced to push the camo makes you motivate yourself to improve your game to remain engaged. It is much faster to become bored with a game like Call of Duty when there is so little to work towards, and things are just given.
The Wrap Up
Just playing Call of Duty is just to have fun, and with camo, we can do just that. We get the pleasure of entertaining ourselves without much effort, doing the grind.
Some players enjoy the thrill of spending countless hours early morning just to play the game and unlock every camo, and others dislike wasting time to unlock camos and would prefer a good game. Both are reasonable. As long as everyone in the community respects having these custom and preferred game loadouts, these stats and flashy promise of mastery camos will remain.
Frequently Asked Questions
Is buying an account a quick way to get banned?
Accounts will remain safe as long as they are bought from safe places. Make sure to buy from a reliable account and game loadout losing company.
Just how long does a mastery camo take to unlock?
Time to unlock mastery camo depends on the game, and mostly, it takes a good and fast player 100 – 150 hours.
3. Do pro players have mastery camos?
Not exactly. Mastery camos are more of a testament to your level of patience. That being said, having to use certain loadouts won’t help your situational awareness.
4. Why do designers create annoying tasks?
Challenging tasks help players develop new skills. It’s also a good tactic to keep players engaged, as these challenges require a significant investment of time to complete.
5. Is buying accounts a hardware ban offense?
This is more common with blatant cheating, like using aimbots and wallhacks. It is very unlikely that just playing on a new, purchased account would result in a hardware ban, though the account could get banned if it were unfairly leveled.

